| 1. | Pokrywczyńska M.♦, Jundziłł A.♦, Adamowicz J.♦, Kowalczyk T., Warda K.♦, Rasmus M.♦, Buchholz Ł.♦, Krzyżanowska S.♦, Nakielski P., Chmielewski T., Bodnar M.♦, Marszałek A.♦, Dębski R.♦, Frontczak-Baniewicz M.M.♦, Mikułowski G., Nowacki M.♦, Kowalewski T.A., Drewa T.♦, Is the Poly (L- Lactide- Co– Caprolactone) Nanofibrous Membrane Suitable for Urinary Bladder Regeneration?,
						PLOS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105295, Vol.9, No.8, pp.105295-1-12, 2014  Abstract:The purpose of this study was to compare: a new five-layered poly (L–lactide–co–caprolactone) (PLC) membrane and small intestinal submucosa (SIS) as a control in rat urinary bladder wall regeneration. The five-layered poly (L–lactide–co–caprolactone) membrane was prepared by an electrospinning process. Adipose tissue was harvested from five 8-week old male Wistar rats. Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) were seeded in a density of 3×106 cells/cm2 onto PLC membrane and SIS scaffolds, and cultured for 5-7 days in the stem cell culture medium. Twenty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into five equal groups. Augmentation cystoplasty was performed in a previously created dome defect. Groups: (I) PLC+ 3×106ADSCs; (II) SIS+ 3×106ADSCs; (III) PLC; (IV) SIS; (V) control. Cystography was performed after three months. The reconstructed urinary bladders were evaluated in H&E and Masson's trichrome staining. Regeneration of all components of the normal urinary bladder wall was observed in bladders augmented with cell-seeded SIS matrices. The urinary bladders augmented with SIS matrices without cells showed fibrosis and graft contraction. Bladder augmentation with the PLC membrane led to numerous undesirable events including: bladder wall perforation, fistula or diverticula formation, and incorporation of the reconstructed wall into the bladder lumen. The new five-layered poly (L–lactide–co–caprolactone) membrane possesses poorer potential for regenerating the urinary bladder wall compared with SIS scaffold.
 Keywords:Affiliations:urinary bladder regeneration, electrospinning
 
 | Pokrywczyńska M. | - | other affiliation |  | Jundziłł A. | - | other affiliation |  | Adamowicz J. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) |  | Kowalczyk T. | - | IPPT PAN |  | Warda K. | - | other affiliation |  | Rasmus M. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) |  | Buchholz Ł. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) |  | Krzyżanowska S. | - | other affiliation |  | Nakielski P. | - | IPPT PAN |  | Chmielewski T. | - | IPPT PAN |  | Bodnar M. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) |  | Marszałek A. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) |  | Dębski R. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) |  | Frontczak-Baniewicz M.M. | - | Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL) |  | Mikułowski G. | - | IPPT PAN |  | Nowacki M. | - | other affiliation |  | Kowalewski T.A. | - | IPPT PAN |  | Drewa T. | - | Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL) | 
 |  |